Wild Horses, Wolves, and American’s Almost Extinct Species

22 Apr

john Oregon Beach

“Scientists know we must protect species because they are working parts of our life-support system.”
— Paul Ehrlich, Entomologist, Population Biologist, Bing Professor of Population Studies and president, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, California

We are watching a serious situation unfold throughout America. We are also currently being convinced it’s okay for this to happen! It’s the very extinction of America’s Wildlife, due to ignorance! Profoundly, conducted by our government agencies and those connected, via subsides and grants within corporations and other private industry, who assists in this venture. It is a very grave and difficult circumstance to observe. The seriousness of this offensive situation to be taken as a priority to react, and stop this nonsense immediately!

America’s Wild Horse Herds, as well as Wolves, serve as an example of this misconduct by our government agencies, corporations, hunter’s, and rancher’s alike. This also includes numerous other species, on the verge of extinction, and overwhelmingly too numerous to mention here (i.e. yes, the list sadly a long one).

The point within a nutshell explanation – the methodology of government misinformation / propaganda (used to promote their extremely large budgets by falsification) has spilled-over into public access; their reasoning irrelevant here as the damage has been done.

Keep in mind this same information is used in many instances within propaganda-filled political speeches, within corporate reasoning for their destruction of both Public and private lands, within the outright killing of our natural as well as wildlife resources in America – and essentially America is a good example, currently, of living these lies!

History is riddled with examples of governments and media that lacks supporting evidence, or is slanted to push an agenda. But government or media messages are only two potential components of misinformation campaigns. It could be said that, in general, the true power of such campaigns lie with the public, or audience, and how thoroughly they accept these messages.


From a very simple amount of misinformation – to the complicated, based on a lot of work looking at propaganda over several decades, a government misinformation campaign is defined as one in which the government intentionally distorts and/or promotes some very questionable information for public dissemination for a particular purpose. Usually the purpose is to gain support for a policy, an action – Wild Horse’s and Wolves examples:

1. Information in regard to false EPA Reports and the requirement for truthful Environmental Assessment being completed;

2. Falsifying or eliminating (e.g. cattle graze) data from grass-lands study – make no doubt a very significant exclusion indeed, placing the blame on other hooved animals when indeed it is NOT them at all, but the cattle;

3. Falsification of regulated wildlife heard counts (i.e. deer, Elk, etc.) and claims of over-kill by predator’s (unsubstantiated by truthful scientific data gather, as referenced by many well known scientist’s and biologists in this field);

4. Guesstimates and population-range counts of wildlife currently given by government agencies, no doubt and obviously side on the elements of regulatory situations, rather than truth – when reasoning for Wolf Kill or Wild Horse Herd Roundups to be completed, and the information given to the public, the counts extremely erroneous and favoring the demand for Management-by-Kill paradigms – even though information seriously false and very obvious as such.

In some instances, more typically, the information is partially true and a certain clear slant is given to it. We’ve known since World War II and the work by the Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels that extreme blatant lies that fly in the face of what an audience directly experiences doesn’t work very often; although the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of the Interior consistently proves that wrong as well. So Goebbels argued that sometimes it’s more important not to deny, say, that a building was bombed, but rather to give it a particular spin to, for example, minimize the damage.

A successful misinformation campaign plays off of several situations. It will seemingly go along with public opinion, it will play off of fear, but most often plays off a lack of evidence – but we do find the evidence later on, and why there exists so much debate now. Those are key things, and that the message is visual, and that it is repeated with some of the same kind of language and discourse—”Here the enemies are again. There they go again.” It can be very effective, these distraction and chaotic confusion elements not to be ignored either.

How things get cast and then ratcheted up as being more important is always fascinating. This is something that strategists, or manipulators, work at very carefully. We call it framing.

How can we frame this issue in a way that will tap into something people are already worried about – such as cost and equating cost with a distraction or confusing element, or just creating a lie about what the cost may be — and that will, and does discredit some other point of view? The cost of keeping our Cowboy and Ranch heritage (falsely assimilated as American’s apathetic to these types of unknowns), however, is almost never an issue because this is something that we just have to do – also most often created, falsely, from distraction, fear, or chaos – or the best of the working set, all three.

This Heritage non-existent today, only kept within the custody of Propaganda (a theater of the mind only, and yet costly to taxpayer’s), manipulating the public’s belief that our government is doing something, rather than simply spending tax money frivolously — consider how our government is saving this Heritage they speak about, in reality they do not do so at all — disappeared among the Fracking sites, oil wells, energy platforms, cattle, etc., and locate that Heritage if you can!


So allow me to further the Wild Horse and Wolves examples, which will give you a perspective on how they drive the general public’s attention away from the Wild Horse Herds or Wolf extermination.

By looking at statements people made in the news media, by looking at opinion polls, listening to spokespersons and so forth, we’re able to start piecing together the kinds of views that people have.

Ironically, the capacity to stir misinformation toward saving the Wild Horse Herds from their natural environment and from starving, to send them to slaughter later, is significantly an oxymoron! But the general Public was convinced of this as a factual circumstance!

Wild Horses do not starve in their natural surrounding, that is, unless human’s have trespassed into their environment and destroyed something significant to their well-being. Horse Management Areas were derived, and payed for by taxpayers, so, indeed, the Wild Horse Herd Environments would not be destroyed! But the government agency paid by taxpayers to manage these areas, have indeed allowed them to be destroyed! Why?

Propagandist’s, in this situation setup their distraction – the starvation of wild horses – which developed into a false discussion of the same, distractingly so, as the truth of the matter (mentioned above) never seemed to reach the general public, nor accepted by the time the truth obvious.

But this type of authority, a government agency, wanted us to see the Wild Horse’s as needy, not tough enough to sustain nature, or live for very long in the winter cold – even though they have survived for centuries (the stupidity factor, or common sense, plays a role here, but the general public does not operate on common sense any longer).

Also, in the case of horses they had to destroy the historical heritage aspects, as well as the peaceful nature of horses – although wild as well — and the natural breeding hierarchy, which in reality keeps their population low; which man’s interference made the increase exponentially and unnaturally in wild horse populations, if the BLM counts relatively accurate, which they are not. Confusion follows and BLM finds it necessary to “not” end the confusion, as it supplements’ the situation, for larger budgets and subsidies to welfare ranchers and corporations, making it much easier to do so without scrutiny — The case for criminality does exist here, if only the Department of Justice would take action!

Now they say we have a Wild Horse problem in America – in truth that is false, as we have an intrusion problem from government and welfare rancher’s being the direct cause, with no Wild Horse problem at all!

The aspect of family within Wolf Packs and how they can enhance a forestry environment by being predator’s overseeing deer or Elk herd populations in a natural management perspective, is not given to the general public either. So the Propagandist will have you ignore, displaced by misinformation, the natural facts, replaced by hate, animosity, ignorance, and data manipulation of scientific reports. The Wolf situation remains a good example of this right now. Ignorance prevails here, nothing more. . . and again quite costly to taxpayers.

It has been shown it becomes very easy for the general public to support a Wild Horse Herd Roundup, the killing of more and more Wolves (out of fear as well, from misinformation), and on it goes – and once that happens, the whole argument shifts.

It’s no longer, “Are we right in our action?” “Was the original information correct that led us to this action?” It shifts from that to “Well, now we have to support the roundups to save the wild horses, or we support the hunter’s as the wolves will kill us if we don’t!” Sounds ridiculous, well guess what, it is ridiculous when one thinks about it! It becomes worse, the displacement toward those who are giving the public at large the truth, are then termed terrorist’s, or other negative and disgusting, packed with hate, denouncements toward humans in general.


Has American politician’s attempt to make Propaganda legal? Absolutely!

“The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the Pentagon, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee’s official website.” – Bi-partisan amendment to the defense authorization bill in 2012 (a trailer ensued but was cut at that time), one that is sponsored by Rep. Mark Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington state. The tweak to the bill would have essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns.

There are those Legislator’s that would like to keep the Bill alive, even today. . . The bill’s supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

Critics of the bill, and I concur, say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

This is dangerous territory, and exploiting the “protect us from the terrorists” excuse isn’t good enough to trump protecting Americans from our own powerful government propaganda campaigns intended to sway public opinion.


Black Propaganda is against the law, still, in America – but there does exist “White Propaganda” and “Gray Propaganda” as well; Although, many government agencies use it, as well as misinformation (also against law, policy, regulatory actions, and management outlines).

It is disgusting that we, as American’s should be “putting-up” with this situation from our elected officials. . . Who and how voted these people into office? Oh, they lied to get into office – perhaps it is time to verify what these politician’s say, and how they go about business with thorough and checked references given to the public. Also their past accomplishments, deeds, or mis-deeds, and out of fairness their explanation toward their mis-deeds – YES, RESPONSIBILITY rears its ugly head once again! We expect no less from those potential employees who may work for us at one time or another!



Literature Cited
Abrams PA (2000) The evolution of predator-prey interactions: theory and evidence. Annu
Rev Ecol Syst 31:79-105
Angelstam P, Wikberg PE, Danilov P, Faber WE, Nygren K (2000) Effects of moose density
on timber quality and biodiversity restoration in Sweden, Finland, and Russian Karelia.
Alces 36:133-145
Aunapuu M, Dahlgren J, Oksanen T, Grellmann D, Oksanen L, Olofsson J, Rammul U,
Schneider M, Johansen G, Hyden HO (2008) Spatial patterns and dynamic responses of
arctic food webs corroborate the Exploitation Ecosystems Hypothesis. Am Nat 171:249-
Bachelet D, Lenihan JM, Daly C, Neilson RP, Ojima DS, Parton WJ (2001) MC1: A dynamic345 vegetation model for estimating the distribution of vegetation and associated ecosystem
fluxes of carbon, nutrients, and water. USDA General Technical Report PNW-GTR-508.
95 pp
Ballard WB, Whitman JS, Gardner CL (1987) Ecology of an exploited wolf population in
south central Alaska. Wildlife Monogr 98:1-54
Berger J (2005) Hunting by carnivores and humans: Does functional redundancy occur and
does it matter? In: Ray J C, Redford K H, Steneck RS, Berger J (eds) Large Carnivores
and the Conservation of Biodiversity, Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp 315-341
Bergerud AT, Wyatt W, Snider B (1983) The role of wolf predation in limiting mouse
population. J Wildl Manage 47: 977-988
Bergerud AT, Elliot JP (1985) Dynamics of caribou and wolves in northern British Columbia.
Can J Zool 64:1515-1529
Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2011) The role of large predators in maintaining riparian plant
communities and river morphology. Geomorphology doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.04.042
Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2007) Wolves, elk, and aspen in the winter range of Jasper National
Park, Canada. Can J For Res 37:1873-1885
Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2009) Large predators and trophic cascades in terrestrial ecosystems
of the western United States. Biol Conserv 142:2401-2414
Beschta RL, Ripple WJ (2010) Mexican wolves, elk, and aspen in Arizona: Is there a trophic
cascade? For Ecol Manage 260:915-922
Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Shurnin JB, Anderson KE, Blanchette CA, Broitman B, Cooper S
Crête M (1999) The distribution of deer biomass supports the hypothesis of exploitation
ecosystems. Ecol Lett 2:223
Daly C, Bachelet D, Lenihan JM, Neilson RP, Parton W, Ojima, D (2000) Dynamic
simulation of tree-grass interactions for global change studies. Ecol Appl 10:449-469
Diamond J M (1983) Ecology: Laboratory, field and natural experiments. Nature 304:586-587
Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon
pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185-190
Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, Essington
TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK,
Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soulé ME,
Virtanen R, Wardle DA (2011) Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth. Science 333:301–306
Fretwell SD (1977) The regulation of plant communities by food chains exploiting them.
Perspect Biol Med 20:169-185
Terborgh J, Lopez L, Nunez P, Rao M, Shahabuddin G, Riveros M, Ascanio R, Lambert TD,
Adler GH, Balbas L (2001) Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.
Science 294:1923-1926
Terborgh J, Estes JA. (ed.) (2010) Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey, and the Changing
Dynamics of Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC 464 p
Trumbull VL, Zielinski EJ, Aharrah EC (1989) The impact of deer browsing on the Allegheny
forest type. North J Appl For 6:162–165
Van Ballenberghe V (1987) Effects of predation on moose numbers: a review of recent North
Amercian studies. Swedish Wildlife Research Supplement 1:431-460
Wilmers CC, Post ES, Peterson RO, Vucetich JA (2006) Disease mediated switch from top486
down to bottom-up control exacerbates climatic effects on moose population
dynamics. Ecol Lett 9:383-389
Woodroffe R, Ginsberg JR (2005) King of Beasts? Evidence for guild redundancy among
large mammalian carnivores. In: Ray JC, Redford KH, Steneck RS, Berger J (eds.) Large


Posted by on April 22, 2014 in Uncategorized


3 responses to “Wild Horses, Wolves, and American’s Almost Extinct Species

  1. Barbara Warner

    April 22, 2014 at 11:32 pm

    Another awesome article. Many thanks, John. I share all of them with their valuable information. Keep them coming please.

  2. arleneorlando

    April 24, 2014 at 11:40 am

    Natures Balance cannot be messed with…………..

  3. wildhorseperilousp

    February 28, 2015 at 5:54 pm

    Great Wild Horse Advocacy here and for the wolves and all of nature’s creatures.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: