Preservation of America's Wildlife

Blog

  • BLM Gov. & Non-Profit Monopolization of Fertility Management on Public Lands

    Editorial — John Cox, M.A. C/M

    “Monopolizing a market has many symptoms. . . We can peruse, and see it happening in the Wild Horse Advocacy, and starting with BLM and extremely False Information about Wild Horse Over-Population.

    1. Wild Horse Over-Population: The false information leads to many outlets, where financially, many government branches within the BLM, obtain financial gain from Taxpayer Money, by supporting the Lies (i.e. Evidence just from BLM math alone, shows us they are corrupted — and the bias-bad-science involved) as well as the Necessity — due to the Fraud of Over-Population lies of Wild Horses — again see the bad math in the Horse Counts – as well as a lack of knowledge about Wild Horses;

    2. Colleges & Non-Profits; Control and total manipulation of their narratives, in regard to the use of Fertility Toxic Chemicals, Darted into Wild Horses – as well as other Wildlife, and we see negative outcomes, of supposed necessity, develop, through these very controlled narratives, pandering mostly to lies and innuendo;

    3. Manipulation & Crafted Control: We observe the manipulation by the monopolizers, involving directly, those who know little to-nothing about Wild Horses. When we combine with Special Interest Generated Science (their narratives control all phases of the product — from the manufacturing of the toxic-experimental chemicals, then to the chemicals darted into Wild Horses) with the evidence that shows a flow of information that lacks details, from those knowledgeable enough to observe their methods of educating the Public. In reality nothing more than Propaganda. It is often opinion-generated outcomes, or, narratives combined with Advertising (i.e. Propaganda), and we find it all influencing a necessity; whereas, good science as well as proper Math ignored, and their information very questionable — Controlled — Manipulative rather than honest. . . Just as often, the Peer Reviews are done by other so-called Research people — and yet, associated with colleges who obtain extremely large financial Grants (taxpayer money under the guise of government contracts) — or, Scientists, that have a financial gain to obtain, and do so, and all accomplished over the past Decade+;

    4. We discover the monopolized circumstances, within, of course, large non-profit groups and colleges and government, to all intertwine within the financial gains and distribution through contracts (i.e. payoffs to those involved, and often) that generates total control — i.e. manufacturing – information dissemination – government contracts, et al colleges – non-profits do the administration details of distribution and paid well to manage the Darters, et al.; whereas, no outside sources can actually par-take and outside science and peer-reviews rejecting these circumstance of necessity entirely, simply ignored or not allowed to partake in discussions, unless part of this hand-picked chosen financial world of Fraud, outright Lies, and a lot of Taxpayer money made available for all the Grifters involved — We call it Monopolization — because it fits the entire dialogue they are achieving.

    In Conclusion:

    It is too obvious to assume differently, and the General Public pay the Price of the financial-gouging and Fraudulent budgets, and assumed necessity — Which, we find ultimately, they control the narrative, they control the research & manufacturing of product, they control the financial distribution — Which Equates to the Monopolization of the Wild Horses and use of Experimental Fertility Drugs forced upon a small population of Wild Horses. Wild Horses sacrificed for Profits.” — John Cox, M.A. C/M

  • All the Facts, Please, All Data Needed – Not Cherry-Picked Data to Appease Your Ignorance and Needs Financially

    Written by
    John Cox, M.A. C/M

    “The truth is in the details — In the field of communication, we separate misinformation from disinformation (campaigns of misinformation), or propaganda (motivated toward an end result by disinformation), or, simply leaving particular cumbersome information out from a subject area, in order to achieve, also, a wanted result, rather than a true result.  This discussion centers around result-oriented situations, and hopefully explains the challenges common-folks, such as you and I experience daily, within today’s rat-race of greed, ignorance, and self-proclaimed experts. .  i.e. controversies.  Diversions that suspend truth into a confusing quagmire of endless different results, most destructive to our environment, as well as our personal well-being.

    We have history that shows us, the inconsistency of science, for example.  More often than not, on our planet, we cannot use a “one-size fits all science” within our Wildlife Environments, across the United States, as well as internationally.  Going back to Ben Franklin and flying his kite, that generated Static Electricity, and he was sheltered from the storm while flying the kite.  Later, a Russian Scientist reviewing Franklin’s discovery, flew his kite into an electrical storm, and was hit, directly, with lightening – the bolt transcended down the kite line, hit the scientist’s head, and blew his shoes off.  He sacrificed his life, unknowingly, due to lack of information, or ignored the truth of the information.  So much for Peer Reviews. 

    Psychologist Catharin Morris Cox deducted, through extensive profiles and Scientific Deductive Reasoning (formula’s et al.) Franklins IQ was around 160 (IQ tests were not done at that time of his life span).  Through Deductive Reasoning, with all of evidence available, nothing set-side due to being an Uncomfortable Truth, or, not equitable within a disinformation context, left out, we see a truth developed into what we refer to as “Fact”.  We find today the term “Fact” is not necessarily a truth to depend upon, when used by itself, and left non-referenced.  The confusion we see today, not just in politics, but within science, as well, and many folks confused.

    Many American wildlife “facts” are distorted by bad science, outdated studies, or myths, often influencing management policies negatively. Common misconceptions include the myth that opossums consume large amounts of ticks (proven false by diet studies in some habitats when stomach contents examined) and that porcupines can shoot their quills. Misinformation extends to policy, where wolf delisting or animal control actions sometimes rely on flawed or non-peer-reviewed data.

    Notable Circumstances of Misinformation / Disinformation

    Wolf Management: Wolf delisting in some areas was based on 2012 research that many wolf biologists did not consider accurate or conclusive.  Yet still referenced, often, by many who do not understand, nor can really tell the difference between poor-science, accomplished by lack of experience in data gathering, and again, a lot of information left out of the data, as well as relied upon myth, or information from those whose finances may be lowered, by Factual-Truth.

    Wild Horse Impact: Evidence tells us that BLM studies have overstated, continuously, the impact of Wild Horses on grazing land while understating the impact of cattle, all the while noticeable, a lot of data not gathered, or ignored, or manipulated, should have not passed Peer Review, due to so many flaws within the data collected.  Severity of sending Wild Horses to Slaughter developed, and still exists to current situations we see today.

    Bad Science in Management

    Misguided Management: A study of 667 wildlife management systems found that many lack clear objectives and evidence, suggesting management is often not truly science-based.

    Wildlife Services: The USDA’s Wildlife Services program has been criticized for killing over a million native animals annually, sometimes based on broad, indiscriminate policies rather than specific, effective science.

    Survivorship Bias: Studies on falling cats (a common “fact”) often only include those taken to a vet, ignoring cats that died at the scene, resulting in skewed survival data. 

    Common Misinformation Sources

    False Narratives: The idea that hunting is entirely necessary for population control is frequently pushed, while studies, with complete details rather than conveniently left out details, show it can disrupt natural self-regulation in ecosystems.  The evidence of destruction within Wilderness Areas, as well as many Forest Habitats and Wildfires attest, equate to results showing us this to be true.  Limited attention given to regulated-permit hunting (as a priority over environmental health) and chosen Wildlife, remains non-scientific, as much as reflects the greed, ignorance, and avarice of hunting and bad science combined into their complex of misinformation – disinformation campaigns . . .

    AI and Social Media: Artificial intelligence and viral videos can create false portrayals of animal behavior, misinforming the public about wildlife needs, and attribute their science as necessary (as incorrect and cumbersomely void of facts)

    We can Conclude

    We see, you and I, many questionable situations today that require our attention, and knowledge, on how to distinguish between truth, and ignorant ranting, yet calling it science.  At the advent of AI becoming much better than over the past couple of decades, we find their truth, notably to be fiction, often developing into what some assume to be reality – or truth.  The more we know about Aristotle’s Dramatic Structure Paradigm, within storytelling, we can assimilate these fictional AI creations, and identify them as what they are, fictional-story-telling – that has indeed overlapped into complete fiction re-mastered as science. 

    But many do not, nor have not, studied story-structure, or Physics, or Biology, but rather learned it through life – as incomplete as that may be.  Cherry-picking, so to speak, what we understand, compared to taking the time to learn the things that are a little more difficult to understand, remains the status-quo; whether, directly or indirectly (social media a good example.  Then derive our own conclusion – once again, facts left out that can be critical.  Destruction does follow, make no doubt.  Perhaps not as dramatic as taking a lightening bolt to the head, and your shoes being blown off, but the results for our Wildlife, our nation’s forests, as well as our entire Terrestrial environment, suffers greatly.  And none of the above, I mention, can defend themselves – So it is up to us, to step up and defend it all.  The priority must develop into all life on this planet to coexist – ignorance picks and chooses life of their choice, yet we see through history, that these types of bigotry are very destructive,” — John Cox M.A. C/M