Photojournalist – Journalist

Article by John Cox, M.A. C/M

Human-wildlife conflict is one of the most pressing toward sustainability-development challenges Globally, with the United States, in reality, ignoring sustainability for profits. . .  Ecologically and economically important wildlife, a larger percentage than what we as humans, can actually keep up with, or understand the complex Ecological System Process. Our paradigms for sustainability often built upon misinformation / disinformation campaigns from political and lobby groups alike. . .  

Impacts and Consequences of Dubious Science

As well, the dubious” science they produce upon a regular basis, i.e. Agricultural and Hunting groups, in particular, well, their “science”, we find through evidence and consequences of their “lack of science”. There exist many negative consequences in Nature and Wilderness areas, that have been spawned and continue to develop negatively today.  In reality, situations such as the aforementioned, simply develop and promote non-sustainable circumstances. 

Even though the continued impact upon the livelihoods of humans, the bias generated from misinformation / disinformation campaigns by lobbyists as well as corrupted politicians, and we discover the consequences – Rather than be dependent upon a balance of Nature / Human Partnership, we dwell in the endeavors of Grifters, Predatory-Profiteers, corrupted government, corporations, and inflation develops. 

Pricing of our surviveability needs, food et al., is no longer dependent upon our Natural Resources throughout America any longer (because we cannot apparently develop good enough land-values to acquire sustainability within our Natural Food Resources); but rather, is decided within a Corporation’s Board Room, often for higher profits, and under the guise of Mandatory Inflation for America to sustain itself – which is, very much, a misinformation trend today. But evidence shows these ongoing and complex processes in Nature, when resolutions conflict with the process, driven by Bias-Hatred or Origination of False information, to demean or fear particular Wildlife. . .

Large carnivores are one such group, and their occurrence within rural communities, often results in real or perceived livestock losses, that place increased costs on households. There does exist disparities associated with the vulnerability, conflicts that do arise from Apex Predators and their “roaming” territories, mostly upon cattle – even though good statistics, data, and well researched science states clearly, other Natural anomalies do exist, that establish a much higher kill rate of cattle – i.e. Lightening Strikes, Drowning in local ponds, creeks or rivers, Disease, diarrhea and pneumonia involved in the majority of cases; also, variables exist, ranging from transition cow diseases, mastitis, injury and/or herd outbreaks of certain diseases such as Salmonella.

Pesticides and Livestock / Wildlife Death

One of many more examples of where your taxpayer dollars go, unnecessarily, when reality and truth discovered . . .  The contents of Pesticide PZP / GONACON, is incomplete to the general public, but it also contains Freund’s Complete Adjuvant, Modified, Mycobacterium butyricum, CAS 9007-81-2, provided as a set of 10 vials each containing: 85% Drakeol 5NF, 15% Arlacel A, and 0.1% M. This is what they are referring to as a Vaccine.

WE CHALLENGE THEIR DISPOSITION, AS SOMETHING THAT IS INNOCENT AND A VACCINE! IT IS NEITHER INNOCENT, NOR A VACCINE — IN THE CORRECT USE OF THE TERM. ALTHOUGH, IT DOES CONTAIN TUBERCULOSIS, AS OUTLINED HERE.

Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) consists of heat-killed Mycobacterium tuberculosis in non-metabolizable oils (paraffin oil and mannide monooleate). CFA contains trehalose 6,6′ dimycolate (TDM), which stimulates Mincle. Additionally, CFA has ligands for TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9. Yes, it can still spread TB (i.e. Tuberculosis, and within a vaccine format — ) We also discover government BLM / DOI covering up these situations, referring to it as Bovine Disease in Cattle and other Wildlife . . .

Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by a bacterium called Mycobacterium tuberculosis (or in Adjuvant form, to kill the Ovum and surrounding tissue = destructively. It is not a vaccine! The bacteria usually attack the lungs, but TB bacteria can attack any part of the body such as the kidney, spine, and brain. Not everyone infected with TB bacteria becomes sick.

How do humans get Mycobacterium tuberculosis?

TB is spread through the air from one person to another. The TB germs are passed through the air when someone who is sick with TB disease coughs, laughs, sings, or sneezes. If you breathe air that has TB germs, you may get TB infection.

There exists today, as this is written, an increase in TB on our Public Lands. The DOI / BLM has set standards of conduct, to remain developing further, pesticides that require more experimentation (as it cannot be legally used any other way and for several reasons – i.e. direct impacts on wilderness areas and on our Public Lands, was “Waived” in order to use the Experimental PZP, GONACON, or Spay-Vac – as we see further increases in Bovine and TB disease) that are far below the standards toward responsibility of human and wildlife health, and threatens both . . .

Apex Predators as well as Prey Species Blamed

We find the cost of Wildlife Management, mostly based upon false and bias “paradigms of science”, that favors Industry and Ranching on American Taxpayer-Owned Federal Lands. Costs to the American Taxpayer’s, i.e. fraud and illegal activities, non-regulatory decisions, has indeed risen to a cost of $-Billions yearly. When we compare the actual costs of “bias and hatred versus reality and truth”, it is the truth that costs the least.

We can reduce the costs of Lands Management upon Federal lands to approximately $5-million yearly.  This is simply by using good, sustainable lands management paradigms, when our land work with us, or alongside and for us, rather than having government entities (i.e. DOI / BLM), stuck in the same place, and within bias / antiquated fake science, or, no science, always trying to re-invent the Wheel; or, re-do a situation of destruction that they, themselves, created.  The circle of taxpayer-involved financing of such a whimsical mass of situations, remains ludicrous . . . Grifters and predatory profiteers are the only people who win in situations like this. And the taxpayers? We simply get stuck with the bill . . .

— Permission to copy any of the above must be approved by Writer – under CopyRight 2024 —

43 U.S.C. – 1901 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 43.
Public Lands – 1901. Congressional findings and declaration of policy
(current as of January 01, 2018 (updated)

Analysis by John Cox, M.A. C/M

(c) the policies of this chapter shall become effective only as specific statutory authority for their implementation is enacted by this chapter or by subsequent legislation, and shall be construed as supplemental to and not in derogation of the process for which public range lands are administered under other provisions of law.

We are constantly told by DOI/BLM employees, that many Laws “make-void”, or, neutralize the Wild Horse and Burro Act of 1971 — which “prevents the Wild Horses to be treated respectfully, and within a Safe and Non-Violent and abusive way.” We find the DOI / BLM Wild Horse and Burro Program has developed a hateful and violent attitude of Bias over the past three decades. This situation alone, as Evidence shows us quite well, and plenty of it (yes, we are horse handlers here with many decades of experience with horses, and know what we see in many videos and photographs, and just how violent and abusive DOI / BLM employees are toward Wild Horses, always) that Administrative Staff turns their heads, and ignores the abuse, as well as the lack of Legal Precedent, to have Roundups at all . . .

This situation alone, causes irreparable damage to our Public Lands, as well as (i.e. most often each roundup may cost taxpayer’s from $1.2 to 2.3 Million dollars each — consider they have 50+ roundups yearly, for no legitimate, nor legal reason) at a considerable cost, we can no longer ignore as Taxpayer’s.

Yes, we can break this down even further, and strongly believe this Law, has been mis-interpreted by the Department of the Interior as well as Bureau of Lands Management.  We have no further to look, than the above – 43 U.S.C. – 1901 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 43 (c)

We, as American’s have been misled in the matters of these Laws, specifically, known corrupted government agency programs, such as the Wild Horse and Burro Program, mislead the Public often, within many phases of their statements issued to the Public. Within honest terminology, their credibility is lacking, significantly. 

Currently, they have corrupted non-profits going-along with their deceptions, and these non-profits are just as guilty.  Why?  Because, as they state clearly when obtaining donations, they will “Fight in Federal Court . . . et al.”, or some similar term to stir the mass audience to donate to them . . . and for the Safety and Well-Being of America’s Wild Horses.  They do not do so . . . and their response to articles such as this, irrelevant, as their credibility is lacking just as much as the DOI / BLM credibility.

Breaking it Down

Clarification required here in terminology (despite legal jargon, words still have standardized meanings). So, we will start with the term “supplemental to” — . . . “. . . provided in addition to what is already present or available to complete or enhance it – in this case scenario, 43 U.S.C. – 1901 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title is not to be the ultimate authority, nor, to “Override” or “Restrict within improper Limitations” the W.H. & B. Act of 1971; but, to work alongside, or enhance the Law, truthfully, and in a way to develop / i.e. enhance the Safety as well as the non-abuse situations the WHB Act of 1971 was developed for, and to regulate the government agencies that Manage our Nation’s Wild Horses, approximately.  Currently, the DOI/BLM ignore this terminology within the 43 U.S.C. – 1901 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title, which is, indeed, a violation of the Act, and in violation of the W.H. & B. Act of 1971.

“derogation of the process . . .” 1. a lessening or weakening (of power, authority, position, etc.) 2. disparagement; detraction. We can also go to Black’s Law Dictionary, which defines “. . . and not in derogation of the process . . .” as not in the ability to “the partial repeal or abolishing of a law, as by a subsequent act which limits its scope or impairs its utility. . . in another word, “43 U.S.C. – 1901 – U.S. Code” is not meant to “limit” nor to “impair” – nor to actually conflict, with present Laws of Management of Our Public Lands and the Wild Horses, in particular, the W.H. & B. Act of 1971, what so ever.

We have not only a conflict with a non-credible government agency, in regard to their abusive behaviors as well as they unsubstantiated Wild Horse Herd Counts and Management theories, but their credibility in Law, is degraded to such a point of being Unacceptable to the American Public (expensive to Taxpayer’s), when the truth be known – which the BLM / DOI ignore the truth, within the WH&B Program, constantly – and is well-known for doing so, by those who are paying attention, and have knowledge of such . . . – John Cox, M.A. C/M