RSS

Tag Archives: science

Semiotics Symbols & Nature’s Signs Relationships

A short Conversation with John Cox, M.A. C/M

“Trees warn each other of danger, within their fungi networks; bacteria will send and receive signal. Confused?  We live in a a world of signs, good and bad.  Can we get lost in this world?  Can perception derail our efforts of staying attuned to what is happening, i.e. developing, right in front of us; or, are we, as humans, so frail and inadequate, that we lose the connection, between Nature and our very Souls, due to myth confused with reality, or lost perceptions. Have we lost touch with our Natural World of Resources, to merely become an enemy to all that surrounds us within Nature? 

They, the animal world around us, know signs about us, i.e. humans, that we would never imagine they could even think about – from their Natural Selection Survival Skills Set.  Their skill set is of reality to stay alive, ours’ not so much.

Our brains have developed, yes once again, through Natural Selection, to make sense of all the signals and the noise we are confronted with, daily.  Yes, some people evolve.  And yes, some have not evolved.  Nature evolves always – from the very necessity of survival.

Humans have an odd situation, ongoing.  Trees do not react to a Lions Roar, or, a Howl from a Wolf, or from any other large mammals because, well, they are trees – understanding this is a good example of what I am talking about here – a tree is a tree, and all I need to say.  And you, as a human, unless a tree has fallen on you, do not fear the tree, but understand it.  You accept the signal and symbol of the tree, precisely, without fear.

Humans on the other hand, from a Lions roar nearby, or a Wolf’s howl nearby, will react, most anyway (i.e. — some humans know better, i.e. from experience or the necessity to “not” over reacting, because nothing good develops from over-reacting) will over-react with indoctrinated “mythic-fear-response”. . . Or, making the situation worse, through bad-decision-making, with “fear” as a major “decision-conclusion-action” dynamic”. 

Our “innate pattern recognition system process” — often confuses reality from mythic-perceptions, is the point I am developing here, in this conversation.  This is a situation that varies, from learned-symbolic observation, signal response, and through experience, from life-forms or species on this plant; but, we share, ironically, with the rest of the animal kingdom or life forms on this planet we live upon.

Much of our signs, for example the dynamic of a Horse, what breed it is, how it rides, its gallop, trot standard, or walk, a horses eating habits, prevention and their health predicated on our understanding combined with our built-in awareness from what we see or hear; and the training of a horse, its mannerism, its conduct, and how they can survive alone in Nature, or within their grazing pasture and with other horses – through Experience, in the matters of health, and keeping them alive. . .  Once again the reading of signs and being attuned to what it is we are seeing, in reality – because our reaction to it may require a life or death decision to be made – Or other variables, far less consequential, but never the less a resolution to be had.  Should we over-react?  With reasoned experience, no reason to over-react what so ever.

We learn to pay attention to certain things, we have experience with, in order to make descent decisions.  If we cannot read the signs appropriately, then we cannot make responsible decisions, then it becomes decisions from perceptions, most often from fear or even hearsay.  And often, perceptions are Fear-Based, and become very destructive.

It is experience, in life, and experience in the resolution development process in regard to how humans make it through life.  Experience denotes whether we are an asinine individual, or a good person, or a normal guy or gal, and gets along with more people than actually makes enemies.  Once again – experience.  We learn to pay attention to things within Our Environment, to pay attention too.  Sadly, we have lost the communication with, our animal world, as well as other life-forms on this planet we live upon, with them all.  A superiority-mental-complex is more destructive than constructive.

If we can concede, that we cannot make appropriate decisions upon everything we see, or observe done, we can become better people.  In another words, humans do not know everything, and face challenges, due to an odd refusal to learn, from other live forms, other than to exploit it, most often for cash-money.  We can be on a valuable lesson-learned – life enhanced form of living, and between humans and Nature alike.  All of this by understanding the “Signs” that we do see and understand, and know the difference between those we must learn about, or maintain the fact, acknowledgement, we do not know something about the things we have no experience or involvement with.  Developing a form of Semiotics (i.e. the formal study or signs and symbols, Cox, John W., Master’s Degree Program, Perceptions of Language Semiotics between Humans’ and Nature) or, of interest to us,  are the habitats of Eco-Signs, or the study of signs between humans, animals, and regional terrestrial landscapes & interactions within the process of habitat health via Natural Selection Process, et al.

I am pointing this out, in conversation, as we are not being attentive today, in the matters of the ability to Process Actively, without personal or special interest agendas, a healthy Habitat and Ecological Process and System.  This is due to an over-reach of destructive perceptions generated “not by experience” with the reginal habitats, so much as myth, finances, and perceptions that steer us away from the ability to make good decisions, about our Ecological Habitats and over all Environments.  Ignorance and Fear can be very harsh, very destructive.”  — John Cox, M.A. C/M

 
 

Tags: , , , ,

You, Me, And Other Things of Importance Over the Fence Post — A Conversation

A Chat by John W.Cox, M.A. C/M

“Just sitting here in the woods, keeping an eye on the horses grazing. It reminds me of realizing how important the science of observation is for us, as horse advocates. But the observation, as Jane Goodall states clearly, is only as good as the truth, which ultimately benefits the knowledge we have of what we see.

In another words, interpretation is the ultimate desire of science and the data we interpret. Experience tells us what to look for. Knowledge and decades of experience together, tells us how to interpret the actual dynamics of the information. It allows us to acknowledge what we are seeing, or reference it, correctly. The fact is, a wrong interpretation, or, a little askew, and we have false information. We have errors that may become extreme, if we have the inability to resolve an issue that could have been easily resolved, or not even developed to require a resolution, had we had the correct information to begin with.

A good example of this is the repetition we hear so often, the Wild Horses being non-indigenous. The negative side of this is the fact this information is repeated, without qualification, always. Never referenced with evidence.

We now find explanation within science, in the research of something as simple as dirt (I keep the terminology simple here, as we do not need the scientific term of fauna and other micro biology terms). Because we need to understand this, in order to correct this situation.

For Example: Current research in the Yukon, and the DNA involved, tells us during the Ice Age, the Wild Horses, as well as Bison, and other animals, we assumed went extinct, could, and did survive, as they had food sources in areas we all assumed food sources frozen or iced over.

This confirmed also, some territories throughout the Pleistocene were tropical zones. This led to more food sources available for the Wild Horses and other grazing animals, like the Wholly Mammoth, or the Pygmy Mammoth. All grazers, and all survived the Pleistocene.

What we have today, are inexperienced people, who say they have a lot of experience, but, simply do not. This is not a harmless situation. A few lies, combined with a few non-knowledgeable interpretations of science, or lack of experience and bad interpretation of what we see, and we find the science-management that decisions are made “from” to be flawed.

In another words, the decisions, for proper management of Wild Horses for example, faulty from the very start. We can see in the matters of the Wild Horses, this situation can mean death — by slaughter and used as meat products.

The fact is, when we see someone discuss 10 or 16 years of experience, and we know for a fact that is a lie, then state they are observing Wild Horses daily; yet, they are domestics from auctions, or bred domestics from ranchers, we then have to acknowledge bad-reference material will enter the science-management system — or nonfactual information about Wild Horses or wolves — as supposed good reference material, in the future. And it will be used to manage Wild Horses, for example, on the range, or in the mountains. Wild Horses will die.

This is why we need to start discussing more so, these supposed people that call themselves Wild Horse Experts. When indeed, they are making an already bad system, much worse (e.g. the system already filled with misinformation and outright lies), with more faulty and erroneous science (i.e. as explained above). Too much misinformation in this system, already leads to mass-confusion at times. Then debates on who is wrong and who is right follow — then nothing for the Wild Horses happen, within a positive manner and process.

Many of the articles I read, and others who check it also, closely, find misinformation abundant, and reference materials in error. Often we find the reference materials some people use in their articles or white papers, to be flawed, and simply non-qualified as a reference to the papers subject matter. Or, the reference not interpreted correctly — and this happens a lot, we see it many times, in many papers.

This faulty science I speak of here, will eventually turn into reference material used in research and scientific papers, more than likely. The consequences serious, and we will have yet more false interpretation on how Wild Horses should be managed. The results of this — total failure.” — John Cox, M.A. C/M

 
1 Comment

Posted by on March 24, 2025 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,