RSS

Tag Archives: biodiversity

Sierra Valley, Calif. Not Wolves But True Rancher Destruction of Our Public Lands From Cattle

Written and Assimilated by
John Cox, M.A. C/M — Horseman

Rather than Discuss Wolves in the Sierra Valley —  Let’s Talk Some Truth, and it’s about time. My research took me into the arena, of the many lies Ranchers tell the Public a lot of the time. Evidence is not only in the statistics, and good old American Common Sense, but the many Cattle they say being killed by such a small number of Wolves, in the Sierra Valley — just makes no damn sense at all.

Whether ranching in the Sierra Valley is “healthy” is a complex issue with no simple answer. While conservation efforts and sustainable practices are ongoing, ranching has had documented negative environmental impacts, particularly concerning water quality and biodiversity

Some sources suggest the industry’s rhetoric of being purely beneficial to the ecosystem is a misleading simplification.  The rhetoric, or constant lies, cover-up the mis-use of our nation’s Public Lands entirely.  We find many ranches there not of historic values, so much as being run incompetently, and just a lot of Poach if Wildlife as well as lands degradation and other illegal activity ongoing constantly.  We also located Desertification developed within much of the Sierra Valley lands, due to over-populated cattle destruction.

Environmental impacts

Water quality:

One of the most significant concerns is the effect of cattle grazing on water quality, especially since the Sierra Nevada mountains provide more than 60% of California’s developed water supply. 

  • Contamination: Research has found that cattle grazing introduces harmful microorganisms, such as E. coli and Cryptosporidium, into waterways through manure.
  • Eutrophication: Nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus from manure can cause eutrophication in lakes and streams, leading to increased algae growth and the potential for toxic algae blooms.
  • Erosion and sedimentation: Trampling by cattle can destroy streamside vegetation, compact soil, and cause erosion, which degrades water quality and damages aquatic habitats. 

Ecosystem and biodiversity:

Ranching activities also impact the broader ecosystem and its biodiversity. 

  • Habitat degradation: Overgrazing can destroy native vegetation and alter plant composition, reducing habitat for native wildlife species.
  • Riparian damage: Sensitive riparian areas, which support a high diversity of species, are particularly vulnerable to trampling and degradation from livestock.
  • Competition with native wildlife: Extensive cattle herds can outcompete native grazers like deer and elk for food resources.
  • Disruption of natural processes: The presence of livestock can interfere with the natural disturbances that ecosystems use to maintain balance. 

Conservation and mitigation efforts

While issues persist, cooperative efforts are being made to address the impacts of ranching. 

  • Public-private partnerships: Land trusts, such as the California Rangeland Trust, work with ranchers to establish conservation easements that prevent development while keeping the land in agricultural production.
  • Adaptive ranching practices: Researchers and ranchers are collaborating to develop strategies that reduce environmental impacts. Techniques include:
    • Using fencing to exclude cattle from sensitive areas like streams and meadows.
    • Providing alternative water and salt sources to draw cattle away from waterways.
    • Implementing rotational grazing to prevent overgrazing.
  • Wildlife coexistence programs: In response to the return of gray wolves, programs have been established to compensate ranchers for livestock losses and provide grants for non-lethal deterrents.
  • Balancing interests: These collaborations involve environmental groups, ranchers, and government agencies, acknowledging the complex trade-offs between agricultural livelihoods, conservation, and ecosystem health. 

Conclusion

The health of the Sierra Valley’s ranching areas is a subject of ongoing debate. While ranching has a long history in the valley and can be managed sustainably, it has also led to documented environmental degradation. The view that it is a “lie to keep ranching” oversimplifies the situation by ignoring genuine efforts to find a balance between agriculture and conservation. However, critics point to persistent issues like water quality impairment and biodiversity loss as evidence that the industry’s positive claims can be misleading. Ultimately, a balanced perspective recognizes both the historical and ongoing challenges posed by ranching, as well as the attempts by some to implement better practice.

——————– Preservation of America’s Wildlife ——————–

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 24, 2025 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,

Overpopulation Lies Convenient for Exploitors, Destructive to our Wilderness Areas and Wildlife

Assimilated and Written by
John Cox M.A. C/M

When we started to look at a few research papers, as well as technical reports, et al, in regard to wildlife and wilderness areas, we found many severe errors — A lot of obviously misinformed and misinterpreted information.

Especially from those associated with exploitation of wildlife, e.g. wild horses, wolves, bears, mountain rams, and the list goes on. Basically we found 95% of the over-population discussions and data, to be outright lies. The data as well as swayed-statistics, conflicted directly with the resolutions provided. Worse, they were paid for by many organizations or government entities, or non-profits, that quite obvious, assumed profit over truth — sacrifice over sustainability, and formed severe disinformation campaigns from their lie-dynamic of presentation.

We can honestly implicate several lobby groups, for example, ranching, hunting, gun manufacturing, oil and gas industry, trapping, and many organizations that tell the public they are “Conservationists”. . . Or, non-profits that state they are “Saving” Wilderness and Wildlife, but involved within the same profit-based dynamic as many others, who merely remain Exploiting Wildlife and Wilderness areas.

Yet the wilderness areas or lands in discussion, are suffering, some destroyed, and directly related to today’s awkward terminology of “Conservationist” lies. E.g. Over hunted, over fished, some wildlife near extinction, other necessary wildlife beneficial to wilderness areas killed, until not enough left to fulfill their benefits given by them, directly to Ecological Areas. The list goes on and on.

Rather than go into lengthy detail, the very foundation of “Conservationist” is established on a lie. The same with their “Harvesting” terminology to cover-up they “kill” a lot of wildlife unnecessarily. Harvesting means replenishment, which is a direct conflict to “killing” something, either almost to extinction, or to extinction.

There is extensive evidence showing global wildlife populations are declining, and claims of overpopulation are largely misleading, and often outright lies, from government and other exploiters of both wilderness and wildlife.

While some localized instances of species overabundance can occur, the claim of general wildlife overpopulation is a persistent misconception that is directly contradicted by decades of credible and truthful scientific research.

Evidence for wildlife decline:

Major conservation organizations report staggering decreases in wildlife populations:

Massive global decline:

The World Wildlife Fund’s (WWF) Living Planet Report 2024 found a catastrophic 73% decline in the average size of monitored wildlife populations between 1970 and 2020.

Vertebrate species are in free-fall: The declines are observed across mammals, birds, fish, amphibians, and reptiles, with freshwater species experiencing the worst drop (85% decline).

Mass extinction event: This sharp and rapid decline has led the vast majority of ecologists to conclude that the planet is in the midst of a sixth mass extinction event.

The idea that wildlife is overpopulated stems from a few factors & sources:

Localized examples: Certain species, particularly white-tailed deer and geese in some areas, can have overabundant populations due to the eradication of their natural predators. This is an exception, not the rule, and is often misconstrued as a widespread phenomenon.

Media misinterpretation:

Headlines have sometimes wrongly suggested that the decline numbers reported by organizations like the WWF mean a specific percentage of all individual animals have been lost. The numbers, however, refer to the average decline across thousands of monitored populations.

Animal farming and pets: When considering total animal biomass, humans and their domesticated livestock now account for 95% of the total mammal biomass on Earth. Claims of wild animals “spiraling out of control” often overlook that the vast majority of commonly consumed animals are artificially bred for human use, not reproducing in the wild.

Misleading blame: Some have used the idea of wildlife overpopulation to justify practices like hunting or to deflect blame for biodiversity loss from human activities.

The primary threats to wildlife populations are all linked to human activity

Habitat loss and degradation:

The conversion of natural land for agriculture, cities, and infrastructure is the biggest driver of wildlife population decline worldwide.

Over-exploitation:

Excessive hunting, fishing, and poaching, including the illegal wildlife trade, are emptying forests and oceans of animals, especially large species.

Climate change: Rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, and the disruption of ecosystems, such as coral reefs and polar regions, threaten numerous species.

Pollution:

Pollution from pesticides, plastics, and other industrial waste is contaminating habitats and poisoning animals. Fertilization Management and Experimentation on Federal Lands and Public Lands.

Invasive species:

The introduction of non-native species, often through human travel and trade, can devastate local wildlife populations.

Quite obvious, until we deny the circumstances of outright lies, to essentially promote exploitation and profits within related organizations that aspire to profits, all the while sacrificing and killing our wildlife and wilderness areas, sustainability nor improvements within any environmental landscape, will lack the benefits of Nature. Human Kind is simply not responsible enough, today, to be honest about the things that need to be accomplished.

John Cox, M.A. C/M — Preservation of America’s Wildlife

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 19, 2025 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , ,